Your Linux distro looks very enticing. I was especially eager to give it
a try on my UEFI-only machine. I burned the DVD from this file:
ROSA.2012.Desktop.Alpha2.x86_64.iso
which had the correct md5sum value.
When the disk failed to boot via UEFI, I checked the contents of the
installation disk. I don't see any of the usual EFI-related files (files
with .efi extensions, for example).
I'm wondering if I misunderstood the description of the release that I
read on Distrowatch.
Does new Alpha 2 really boot via UEFI?
Re: Does new Alpha 2 really boot via UEFI?
Hello, can you try please one of this images
http://mirror.yandex.ru/rosa/rosa2012.1 ... estimages/
http://mirror.yandex.ru/rosa/rosa2012.1 ... estimages/
Re: Does new Alpha 2 really boot via UEFI?
Yes, I did have the non-UEFI ISO. I used the one you provided a link for, and the live DVD boots via UEFI and operates fine. I haven't succeeded in installing Rosa to my hard drive, however. I'll keep trying. I got a grub error the first time. I'll post again with more specifics if it happens again.
Thanks. You have some good desktop designers, by the way -- very aesthetically appealing.
Thanks. You have some good desktop designers, by the way -- very aesthetically appealing.
Re: Does new Alpha 2 really boot via UEFI?
It appears that the install-to-hard-drive routine is not quite finished, at least not for an EFI installation.
I'll check back in a little while. I know this is just an alpha release.
Again, it certainly looks nice!
I'll check back in a little while. I know this is just an alpha release.
Again, it certainly looks nice!
Re: Does new Alpha 2 really boot via UEFI?
Take a loook at this topic, but it was Grub 0.9* relatedvarxx писал(а): I got a grub error the first time. I'll post again with more specifics if it happens again.
Re: Does new Alpha 2 really boot via UEFI?
This may be true, there are some fixes expected soon.varxx писал(а):It appears that the install-to-hard-drive routine is not quite finished, at least not for an EFI installation.